This petition for Post-Conviction Relief (PCR) is Willie Cory Godbolt’s attempt to have his convictions and death sentences overturned by the Mississippi Supreme Court. Essentially, he is arguing that his trial was so fundamentally broken that the results should not stand.
Here is a breakdown of his main arguments in simple terms:
The Missing Mental Health Check (Structural Error)
Godbolt’s biggest argument is that the court ordered a psychiatric evaluation before his trial, but it never actually happened.
Under Mississippi law, once a judge decides there is reasonable ground to doubt a defendant’s mental fitness, a competency evaluation is mandatory, not optional. He argues that taking a defendant to trial without prior mental health evaluation is a structural error that should render the trial invalid.
Defence: As no mental health evaluation was carried out then, he says the evidence needed for his only true defence – that he was having a mental breakdown and didn’t plan the crimes – a ‘Heat of Passion’ is irretrievably lost. You can’t accurately recreate a person’s mental state from years ago. That evidence is lost forever.
The Destroyed Cell Phone (Evidence Loss)
Godbolt claims the State destroyed his cell phone while trying to get data off it.
He says that his phone contained text messages that would have demonstrated his state of mind and impeached (proven wrong) the witnesses against him.
He argues this wasn’t just an accident; it was a reckless disregard for evidence that could have helped him. If the State destroys evidence central to a person’s defence, it’s a violation of Due Process.
Forced to Represent Himself (Constructive Denial of Counsel)
At Godbolt’s first appeal, he ended up filing his own Pro Se briefs.
He says his lawyers refused to raise the issue of his mental health and phone issues on appeal. When he asked for new lawyers, the court told him to keep his existing lawyers or represent himself.
The Result: He argues that forcing a person, especially one with questioned mental health competency, to handle their own death penalty appeal is “constructive abandonment” by the legal system.
The “Race and Class” Comparison (Equal Protection)
Godbolt points to a case involving a white physician. Dr. Ralph Smith was charged with Capital Murder in Mississippi. Dr. Smith’s trial was stopped because of mental health issues, and he was sent to a hospital instead of prison. The inequity is clear. Godbolt argues it is unfair (an Equal Protection Violation) that a wealthy, white professional received medical help while a poor black man in the same situation was sent to Death Row without even getting the evaluation the court ordered.
What this could mean for him:
If he wins on “Structural Error: The Supreme Court could vacate his convictions and sentences. He would likely get a brand-new trial where his mental health is properly evaluated first.
If the court finds the Evidence Loss is irreparable: He is asking the court to dismiss the charges entirely because he can never get a fair trial now that the phone data is lost and his 2017 mental state obviously can’t be examined.
The Minimum Goal: Willie Godbolt requests an Evidentiary Hearing where he can bring in experts and witnesses to prove these claims in front of a judge.
Willie Cory Godbolt would like to use this football analogy; if a referee in a championship game missed a huge, obvious foul that changed the whole outcome of the game then league has to fix it.
What follows is a breakdown of why this is a heavyweight argument that could win his appeal, explained simply.
The “Automatic Foul” (Structural Error)
In Mississippi law, there are some rules you just can’t break. Checking if a person is mentally well enough to understand their trial is one of them.
The Rule: if a judge even suspects you might have mental health issues, they must order a mental health evaluation. It’s not a choice; it’s a requirement. The court ordered the mental health evaluation however it but it never happened.
We refer you to ‘Sanders v. State’, the Mississippi Supreme Court said that skipping this is a structural error. That’s legal-speak for an automatic foul. It renders the whole trial broken from the first day, and the result usually has to be thrown out.
You Can’t Rewind Time (The “No Do-Over” Problem)
The State might try to say – We’ll give him the mental check-up now, five years later. However, this is problematic and supported by a previous case.
The case Coleman v. State says you cannot do a mental check-up years after the fact.
The Reality: You can’t tell what a man was thinking in 2017 by looking at him in 2026. Because the State failed to complete the required mental health evaluation at the appropriate time the evidence of Godbolt’s mental state at the time of the crime is gone forever. They can’t prove his state of mind then, they can’t legally give him a fair trial now.
The ‘Double Standard’ (Equal Protection)
This is about fairness on the street level. Godbolt is pointing at how the law treats people differently based on race and class. That is only part of the picture. Age can play a factor too in the US criminal justice system. Young, black, male defendants can be perceived as more dangerous than white counterparts. Being associated with a particular neighbourhood can also impact and influence how you are treated. Mental illness itself can be racialised. White offenders are more likely to be portrayed through a mental health lens whilst black offenders are more likely to be portrayed through a criminality lens.
Again, the white doctor, Dr. Ralph Smith, was also charged with capital murder in Mississippi. The court stopped the doctor’s trial because of his mental health and sent him to a hospital instead of Death Row.
Conflict: Godbolt is a Black man who was denied that same mental health check and sent to death row.
‘Equal Protection’ in law should apply to everybody. meaning the rules should be the same for everyone.
The Destroyed Cell Phone Evidence
Godbolt says the state destroyed his phone, which had messages proving he was in a ‘Heat of Passion’ – a mental breakdown, as opposed to planning a crime.
With reference to the ‘Youngblood’ case – if the State destroys evidence in bad faith, on purpose or with reckless disregard, the case can be dismissed. Godbolt argues that since the State lost his phone data, they shouldn’t be allowed to keep him on death row.
WILLIE GODBOLT’S CONCLUSION
Godbolt is telling the Supreme Court: “You didn’t follow your own rules, you treated me differently to a white doctor, and you destroyed my evidence. Because of that, the trial wasn’t real justice, it was a mistake that needs to be erased.”
September 2026.
Discover more from Humans Remain
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.